We Do Care Global original logo WE DO CAREGLOBAL
← All systems Evaluation / Control surface 04

Agent EvalEvidence for the next step.

Make agentic workflows easier to inspect through evidence-driven metrics and execution assessment.

Task success Tool-call accuracy Policy compliance Next branch
01 / Project focus

Measure the workflow,
not the model.

A model answer can be correct by luck. Agent Eval measures what actually happened: which tools were called, whether they succeeded, and whether policy held.

Task successDid it finish?

Whether the workflow reached its declared end state, counted against a stated definition of done.

Tool accuracyDid it pick right?

Whether the tool sequence matched the reference path, and how many calls were wasted.

Policy complianceDid it stay in bounds?

Whether every call passed policy evaluation without an override or bypass.

LatencyHow long?

Decision and end-to-end latency at a declared percentile, not an average.

02 / Illustrative values

What a threshold
looks like.

These retained sample values explain the shape of an acceptance rule. They are not a current benchmark and not a report of tests run against the Next release.

Local threshold explorer

Adjust the acceptance rules below. The sample measurements stay fixed; no evaluation is run.

4 of 5 example rules pass · acceptance blocked
Illustrative values, not measured production performance
MetricExampleAcceptance ruleResult
Task success92.4%≥ 90%PASS
Tool-call accuracy88.1%≥ 85%PASS
Policy compliance100%= 100%PASS
Decision latency P9518.2 ms≤ 25 msPASS
Errors in allowed calls11.8%≤ 5%FAIL

For a measured result, publish the code revision, dataset, successful-task definition, environment, sample count and raw output. A tool being allowed is not the same as successful task completion.

03 / Scope and verification

Where the line is.

Evaluation tooling is a means, not a verdict. What counts as good performance has to be defined by you.

Not a correctness claim

Published evaluation tooling does not certify model correctness. Test coverage, datasets and acceptance thresholds need to fit your use case.

Source and publication

Source availability and publication records do not certify the current Next revision. Review release notes, tests and deployment assumptions for your environment.

04 / Source and publication

Where to go
next.

The current development branch, the running documentation, the published original and its permanent record.

The DOI identifies a published record. Consult that record for its exact version and files; it does not automatically identify the latest Next commit.

05 / Discuss your use case

Start with your
acceptance criteria.

Describe the task, the definition of done and the threshold you would refuse to ship below. That is the whole conversation.